Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

The Asian Student Medical Journal

About The Asian Student Medical Journal

Writing for Asian Student Medical Journal

Editorial Team

Medical Student Resources

Medical Student Forums

Disclaimer

©Asian Student Medical Journal 2002-2005 All Rights Reserved

 

 

POLICY PLATFORM ON

MEDICAL EDUCATION-APPENDIX

[condt..]

APPENDIX I

In the following appendix, a number of quotes from the literature supporting our position are presented.  This format was deliberately chosen in order to preserve the coherence of the text of the policy platform.  The reader is reminded that this document is not a scientific treatise, but a political statement of purpose and intent.

"Arising from 19th century precedents, medical education still includes features which are now outmoded: The division of training into a scientific/theoretical section and a clinical section.

At present in medical education there is increasing recognition of:

  • The growing number of different sciences and techniques involved
  • The need, because of the mass of information, to lead students to understand principles rather than to overload them with too much factual information.
  • The difficulty that basic science is taught at a stage when the students do not relate it to practical medicine, whereas at a later stage when they could more easily grasp the practical value of basic science their knowledge tends to be forgotten or outmoded.
  • The need for new teaching methods in medical education."
  •  

(From document no. III/D/32/1/78 EN of the Commission of the European Community, Advisory Committee on Medical Training.)

"Extensive comparative research data have given evidence that traditional ME, i.e. lecturing in separate subjects, fails to provide an effective and efficient way of reaching sufficient educational goals, e.g. professional competence. Investigations show that medical training does not give sufficient consideration to the cognitive aspects of science and the humanities, to the clinical, social and scientific skills and to the development of basic modes of behaviour which everybody needs who is to practice the medical profession.  The curriculum today offers the students a mass of knowledge with a distinct bias in favour of clinical medicine." (F.J.A. Huyjen, General Practice International 3:117, 1981)

"Experience shows that sound curriculum planning and the improvement of current ME schemes needs the assistance of efficient and productive units of ME, which need to be established in every medical faculty."  (G.E. Miller, Public Health Papers, 61:99, WHO 1974)

"Traditional preclinical science studies have been found to be rather irrelevant and even counterproductive for the rational acquirement of professional competence of a medical doctor. Counterproductive in the sense that they lead to inadequate learning patterns and generally are seen to be a most ineffective way of studying. Empirical data indicate that nonscience students will perform as well or even better than traditional science trained students on almost all performance measures, which were used in a large investigation.  This result is supported by other similar studies." (D.P. Yens and B. Stimmel, J. Med. Ed. 57:429, 1982)

"There is strong evidence, theoretically and through empirical data, that an integrated problem based approach in teaching/learning is far more effective and efficient than the currently used subject‑centered approach.  This relates to practical as well as to scientific skills." (W.C. McGaghie et al., Public Health Papers 68, WHO 1978)

(See also: H.G. Schmidt, Med. Ed. 17:11, 1982)

"The rational planning of ME must be based on evaluation data. However, in most medical schools the examinations and the curricula {as such are hardly evaluated.  Generally, there is an absence of valid evaluation of both the students' competence and of the adequacy of the curriculum.  Contrarily, examinations are used which force students to adopt inappropriate learning patterns." (IFMSA Internal Information Service, XXXIII,1, 1984)

"Current licensure procedures to a great extent serve the purpose of legitimising disciplines/subjects included in the ME curriculum and of granting prestige and status to the individuals and faculties teaching these subjects.  This element is much stronger in the traditional subject centered type of curriculum than the guarantee of a given level of competence and the orientation of the learning behavior of students towards said competencies, though these are meant to be the purpose of licensure examinations.  This kind of inadequate function is inherent in regulation systems in which a number of subjects/disciplines are defined instead of the competencies required."  (H.G. Pauli, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 7,3:245, 1982)

"Innovations in ME along the "addition model," i.e. the introduction of new subjects such as preventive medicine and general medicine to existing subjects and the subject‑centered curriculum structure, have been futile attempts, exemplified by the evidence of no significant changes in the qualifications of graduates in relation to being prepared for community medicine where such additions have taken place."  (J. Schmidt, R. Steele and E. Pich, WHO conference paper, Nov. 1983)

"There is a tendency of a constant increase of the length of education before licensure for independent practice is granted. However, systematic investigations make evident that there is no such thing as a "completely" trained doctor, but only a graduate who is able to work independently and safely which includes the ability of cooperating with peers and specialists and life‑long learning skills.  This necessitates a selection of what may comprise the basic curriculum of medical school derived from professional analysis in order to rationalize the constant increase of health related scientific knowledge and practice. Truly integrated and need oriented medical schools give evidence that such an acceptable level of competence, allowing independent practice, is reachable within the time limits of current undergraduate programmes."  (University Center for Health Sciences, Beer Sheva, Israel, 1982)

"It is considered that postgraduate training is a costly enterprise in that sense that it compensates to a great extent for insufficient undergraduate curriculum planning and poor health manpower planning." (IFMSA, Resolution of L'Aquila, 1983.)

"Postgraduate programmes are generally hospital based. Specialization training for general/community medicine are perpetuating the lack of field training which is also common in undergraduate education and therefore hardly allow for completion of an insufficient undergraduate training for community medicine." (E. Sturm, General Practice International 1:24, 1980.)

"There is a growing claim of an overproduction of doctors. However, the qualitative aspects of the qualification of doctors are hardly considered when "ideal" ratios are indicated.

The range of doctor‑population ratios in Europe is 37‑fold which clearly implies that other parameters must be used to adequately describe the state of a health care system.  As well as for hospital beds (12‑ fold) there are also great differences for the number of nurses per population (14‑fold)."  (H.G. Pauli, D. Hall and H. van Maanen, Health Services in Europe, Chap. 10, WHO Europe, Copenhagen 1981.)

"Any thoughtful observer of medical schools will be troubled by the regularity with which the educational system of these schools is isolated from the health service systems of the countries concerned.  In many countries these schools and faculties are, indeed, the proverbial ivory towers.  They prepare their students for certain high, obscure, ill‑defined, and allegedly international "academic standards" and for dimly perceived requirements of the twenty‑first century, largely forgetting or even ignoring the pressing health needs of today's and tomorrow's society." (H. Mahler, World Health Forum, 2,1:5, 1981.)

"Medical schools often are ivory towers apart from the demands of the health care system.

However, new approaches in combining health care and education have proven to be effective.  If the medical school as the academic institution which is responsible for the health manpower training participates in the planning and implementation of all levels of health services for an entire region, and if the community is involved in the planning of the curriculum, a coordination and a rational curriculum planning can be effectively achieved." (M. Prywes, Health Policy and Education 1:291, 1981.)

"Current ME emphasizes the clinical aspects of diseases and health problems and largely ignores the natural history of diseases.  However, a large, thorough investigation shows that health, illness and premature death depend primarily on environmental influences and behavioural factors, with the exception of those rather infrequent diseases which are determined at fertilization." (T. McKeown, The Role of Medicine, Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust, London, 1976.)

"The medical profession is supposed to define and resolve health problems.  However, sociological analyses show that, due to the reductionism to clinical concepts, the medical profession and the professionalization (i.e. ME) are characterized by a failure to take into account the expectations of people." (Gmelin in Ritter, EARDHE Congress Preparatory Papers, Vol. 1, 1983, European Ass. for Research Developments in Higher Education.)

"Large investigations, such as "Health Care ‑ an International Study," have shown that the perception of disease and health problems by the medical profession (through the medical model of hospital based university medicine, i.e. including ME) is quite far away from the actual health problems people suffer from (perceived morbidity)."   (Kohn and K.L. White, Health Care ‑ an International Study, Oxford University Press, London 1976.)

"The hospital view of health care problems obviously leads to an ineffective and uneconomic delivery of health care.  The concept of PHC, however, is likely to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of health care by using a more comprehensive bio psychosocial approach and by identifying the most effective phase of intervention in the natural history of diseases. The neglection of PHC may explain that health has not improved, exemplified by the notion of a decreasing life‑expectancy in European countries, and many needs are not met, especially as regards community services, although vast amounts of resources and finances have been absorbed by the present health care systems in Europe."  (E. Maxwell, Health Care, The Growing Dilemna, McKinsey, N.Y. 1975.)

"The education in as many as possible subjects in ME was meant to provide a comprehensive education.  However, the simultaneous restriction to specialized subjects that are practiced in hospitals has become a major source for a limited and questionable qualification of doctors.  It is evident that from a point of view of the function of different services ME has become most reductionistic by ignoring the level of primary and practically secondary health care.  Universities and teaching hospitals deal with only those limited problems that are assigned to different medical subjects that need tertiary medical care. However, several investigations show that most of the health problems are resolved by self‑care and self‑medication, and that from the health problems the medical profession is confronted with, only 1% need the services of a university hospital, and 10% need hospital care at all. (L. White, Scientific American 229:23, 1973.)

"ME is meant to prepare for medical practice.  However, a 25‑year analysis of the medical conditions seen in a British general practice show that the diseases seen during traditional ME are at the end of this list, if ranked according to diseases' frequency, or are not included in ME at all."  ( Fry, Common Diseases, Their Nature, Incidence and Care.  MTP Medical and Technical Publishing Co. Ltd., Lancaster, 1974)

"Traditional ME is generally planned or "arranged" along very arbitrary criteria.  However, there is an urgent need to define the goals of ME clearly in order to cope with the exploding health related information.  These goals must be socially acceptable which implies an emphasis on PHC, based on epidemiological considerations and the analysis of health care demands (health surveys, epidemiology, professional analysis.)" (J.J. Guilbert, Educational Handbook for Health Personnel, Offset Publication No. 35, WHO, 1981.)

"An emphasis on PHC has been stipulated at various occasions. The WHO/UNICEF‑Conference of Alma Ata declared that PHC was the key to achieving "Health for All", and the governments committed themselves to foster PHC, which includes a reorientation of ME and Health Manpower Planning generally."  (PHC, Int'l Conference on PHC, Alma Ata Report, 1978.)

."The European Governments have reinforced the Alma Ata Declaration and aim at a reorientation of ME towards PHC, as stated in the WHO Regional Strategy."  (Regional Strategy for Attaining HFA 2000, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1982.)

"ME is, among other purposes, to provide the future doctors with the scientific background for future practice and more: to make them able to cope with the changing knowledge and the changing patterns of diseases. However, scientific and critical thinking and scientifically based practicing must not be confused with only the recalling of scientific knowledge.  Science based on clinical concepts is dominating the medical models of health and disease. Investigations and a bio psychosocial approach in defining concepts of health and disease, however, make evident that current medical data and perceptions rather describe illness‑behaviour than illness itself, and thus, the natural history of diseases without being medically treated is hardly understood.  The statistics on health and illness are biased. Aetiology of diseases must be understood in a comprehensive model which combines psychological and sociological data with biomedical knowledge."  (D.A. Hamburg, G.R. Elliot, D.L. Paron, Health and Behavior, Frontiers of Research in the Behavioural Sciences.  National Academy Press, Washington 1982.)

"Coronary heart disease can be taken as an example of one of the most prevailing causes of premature death in European countries.  Although biomedical and pathological research are well advanced they may explain only a minority of the reasons for the prevalence of these diseases.

ME and medical practice ignore to a great extent that a range of behavioural factors (Friedman and Roseman) and sociological conditions can explain to some considerable extent the Aetiology of CHD (J. Siegrist et.al.).  However, interventions based on purely medical means, i.e. following the traditional clinical model, have failed to show a significant impact on the prevention of this disease, although large amounts of resources have been invested for it."  (M. Oliver, Lancet ii:37, 1983)

"Current ME takes place almost exclusively in hospitals. However, a comparison of professional analysis in primary and hospital care (specialized care) show a significant difference in the role of different scientific areas, which vary in their relevance for the health problems in both areas.  Primary care needs to be based on sociology and epidemiology to a large extent, whereas specialized medicine on the secondary and tertiary level is rather based on clinical sciences.  ME mainly takes place in hospitals and thus does not provide the scientific background for medical practice."  (D. Barr in H. Noack, Medical Education and PHC, Croom Helm, London, 1980.)

"Health problems in primary care are to a great extent only understandable on the subjective biographical background of the patient.  Clinical examinations may not help and often are even qualified to aggravate the health problem by reinforcing a somatic fixation, which leads to a chronification of the problem, thus a pure clinical approach must be considered as obsolete. In order to avoid an irrational use of clinical facilities and to avoid a chronification of health problems, which is relevant for well about half of the health disturbances a doctor sees, a sound approach that includes psychotherapeutic qualities is essential."  (M. Balint, The Doctor, his Patient and the Illness, Tavistock, London, 1957.)

APPENDIX II

In this appendix, some titles are given as suggested reading for those interested in the problems touched upon in this document. Of course, the quotes in appendix I come from commendable books and articles.

  1. AAMC 1983: Emerging perspectives on the general professional education of the physician.
  2. AAMC  1984:  Physicians for the Twenty‑First Century.  Report of the panel on the general professional education of the physician and college preparation for medicine.
  3. IFMSA 1983:  Resolution on Medical Education, L'Aquila, Italy
  4. IFMSA 1984:  Resolution on Medical Education, Solbacka, Sweden
  5. WHO 1984:  Report from the Exeter Expert Committee meeting on undergraduate medical education.
  6. Illich, Ivan, 1976.  Limits of Medicine.
  7. EEC Commission 1979:  Protocol of the Advisory Committee on Medical Education.
  8. Mager, Robert F. 1961:  On the Sequencing of Instructional Content.  Psychological Reports, 1961, 9 pp. 405 ‑413.
  9. Barrows, H. S. and Tamblyn, 1980:  Problem Based Learning. Springer, N.Y.
  10. Schmidt, Henk, 1983:  Problem Based Learning ‑ Rationale and Description.  Journal of Medical Education 1983, 17, pp. 11 ‑ 16.
  11. Piaget, J., 1954: The Construction of Reality in the Child. N.Y.  (A cogent and contemporary analysis of learning processes, very much applicable to ME)
  12. Illeris, Knud, 1973:  Problem Orientering og Deltager Styring (Problem Orientation and Participant Steering) Munksgaard, Copenhagen.  Unfortunately, this and other books of Illeris are not available in English.
  13. Kaufman, A., et. al., 1982:  Undergraduate Medical Education for Primary Care.  Southern Medical Journal  75:9, 1982, pp. 1110 ‑ 1117.
  14. Guilbert, J.J., 1980:  Educational Handbook for Health Personnel, 2nd. Ed.  WHO publications.
  15. Berg O. 1975: Health and Quality of Life, J. Scand. Sociol. Ass. 18:3, 1975
  16. Cartwright A., 1967: Patients and Their Doctors, A Study of General Practice, Routledge and Keagan Paul, London.
  17. Cartwright A. Anderson R., 1979: Patients and Their Doctors (II), J. of Royal College of Gen. Prac. occasional paper.
  18. Dubos R., 1980: Man Adapting, Yale University Press, Hew Haven, USA.
  19. Feinstein AR, 1970: What kind of basic science for clinical medicine?  New England J. of Med. 283:847.
  20. McGaghie, et. al. 1978: WHO Public Health Paper No. 68
  21. Katz FM and Fülop T, 1978 ‑ 1980: WHO Public Paper No. 70 and 71
  22. Katz FM and Snow R., 1980: WHO Public Health Paper No. 72

APPENDIX III

In this appendix, the activities of the IFMSA concerning medical education are listed.  Although the activities began before 1979, the list is not complete for this period due to a lack of continuity in the infrastructure of the IFMSA.

  1. August 1979:  IFMSA Declaration of Kiljava ‑ on PHC and ME
  2. August 1980:  IFMSA Declaration of Cairo ‑ on PHC and ME, reinforcing and deliberating on the Kiljava Declaration.
  3. April 1981:  Regional Assembly Iceland.  The Standing Committee on ME (SCOME) was reorganized on a European scale, and the regional organisation was rejuvenated.
  4. April 1982:  Two‑Country seminar on ME.  German and Swiss national member associations hold a critical seminar on ME.
  5. August 1982:  Workshop on ME. Title: Fitting ME to the needs of whom?  First SCOME workshop with the assistance of WHO
  6. Sept. 1982:  AMEE‑meeting, Cambridge.  Contacts to AMEE cemented, SCOME participates.
  7. April 1983:  Workshop on ME.  Title: ME in crisis.  SCOME explores the scope and depth of the inadequacy of ME with the assistance of leading experts on the subject.
  8. May 1983:  Network of community oriented educational institutions for health sciences symposium.  SCOME establishes contact with Network.
  9. July 1983:  WHO expert committee meeting, Exeter.  Title: PHC in undergraduate ME.  SCOME broadens its collaboration with WHO.
  10. August 1983:  General Assembly, L'Aquila, Italy.  Resolution of L'Aquila ‑addressing the constant lengthening of pre‑licensure ME without improving the adequacy of undergraduate ME. Workshop on ME with WHO assistance. Title: ME Evaluation: Roulette or valid assessment?
  11. Sept. 1983:  AMEE conference Prague, Czechoslovakia.  SCOME contacts to AMEE are cemented and broadened.
  12. Nov. 1983:  WHO conference on PHC in industrialized countries. SCOME is invited to present a paper.  SCOME establishes itself as manifest entity in ME discussions.
  13. Dec. 1983:  Expert Committee on health manpower planning, WHO Geneva, Switzerland. SCOME participates.
  14. April 1984:  Regional Assembly, Denmark.  The policy platform is drafted and the editing process instigated.  Workshop on ME. Title:  PHC in undergraduate ME with assistance of WHO and leading experts.
  15. April 1984:  SCOME participates in a collaborative effort with the International Pharmaceutical Students Federation.  Areas of common interest are explored.
  16. August 1984:  General Assembly, Sweden.  Workshop on ME.  Title: Workshop planning and implementation.  WHO assists.  Resolution of Sweden on ME ‑ concerning the creation of ME institutes at medical schools.
  17. Sept. 1984:  SCOME is invited to moderate a session on ME at AMEEs annual meeting in Oslo, Norway.
  18. Oct. 1984:  SCOME is invited to a planning session for a Network meeting concerning strategies for change in existing medical schools in order to bring them into line with current ME theory.
  19. Nov. 1984:  SCOME is invited as planner of a session on ME at Milanomedicina in Milano, Italy, describing the crisis in ME.

 

 

 

ASMJ has moved to www.asmj.org This site supported by www.aippg.com